It struck me the other day as I was reading some news item,
that we expect our politicians to be brighter than us, to have fewer faults
than us and to never, ever have done anything dumb in their lives. I think that
those are fair assumptions - we just shouldn't be terribly disappointed in
those folks when it turns out that they are not quite as perfect as they
suggested they were. I sometimes wonder if our disappointment in them is at
least partially connected to our feelings of
us, one more time, being so stupid as to believe their self-stated
perfection in the first place.
It feels as if there are more and more politicians
publically being exposed for the humans they are - flawed (sometimes fatally),
full of weakness and missteps, incapable of making a clear decision and
sticking to it and generally being as incompetent as the rest of us. Some of
these revelations are of course, the politician own fault. In a technological
era of social media, where every pundit harps upon the importance of candidates
and elected politicians to be connected to the "people" via various social
media platforms, it is hardly surprising that some people fall into the trap of
putting things "on paper" that they shouldn't.
One could wonder (and perhaps even guess) what the first
Trudeau thought about the Queen or the separatists in Quebec or some of his
ministers, but we did not get to know until he decided to tell us. For that
leader and the thousands of other politicians, dissemination of their thoughts
could not be instantaneous. The process of sharing their thoughts was filtered
by the process of writing. All of us who write know that typing is faster than
writing in longhand. The actual acts of holding a pen and having to reasonably
carefully shape the letters slows down the thinking process. One actually has
to think before putting the words on the paper. There was no delete button on
the pen. This process stopped or at
least limited whatever stupidity that was circulating in our brain from leaking
out.
While the blond headed buffoon/leader in the country to the
south of Canada is perhaps currently the most famous/infamous politician who
spews out what ever enters his limited mind - many politicians seemed equally
as compulsed to share their thoughts and activities to anyone who has a Twitter
account. We perhaps should be less judgemental as to what they write in the
spur of the moment. If we want real, raw, unfiltered thoughts - if we expect
them to be honest about what they are thinking - we probable should not expect
particularly clear or logical thinking. Perhaps we should just accept that
social media is at best a mechanism that at best, provides a superficial view of
an issue, a view that is limited by both the lack of facts and a substantive
discussion.
If we stop trying to use such platforms to have meaningful
conversations and if we stop pretending that connecting to "friends"
is a valid substitution for relationships - perhaps our politicians will
attempt to communicate with us in ways that are more useful and less fraught
with the risk of misunderstanding.