I was talking to a friend the other day about the Olympics
and the fact that I found it more than a little absurd that the world could
spend up to 50 billion dollars on a two week celebration of elite sports while each
day hundreds of people were dying in Syria. The person I was chatting to suggested
that I was comparing apples to oranges, that there was really very little correlation
between how much a country spends on sports as compared to whether or not they
contribute to world peace or try to do something to stop people from starving.
I disagree. I think there is a direct link between how much
money we spend on assisting those countries who are less able to function well
and how much we spend within our country to support what some refer to as our
cultural activities. Clearly a country
that can (or its individual citizens can) devote resources to supporting its
elite athletes will have less money to devote to its international humanitarian
aid . Living in a intergenerational era where reduced taxes are the ideal -
there is clearly not enough money to do either well. I think the question that needs to be
addressed is what are our priorities?
The argument that is sometimes made (as it certainly was by
a number of my students in some of the classes I taught at college) is that we as
a country do not have enough money to do everything; that we should focus
helping people inside Canada; that people from other parts of the world cannot
and should not be our priority. This
argument might have a slight tinge of truth if there was any sign of any
political will to deal with the issues of poverty, inequity of education and opportunity
or the myriad of other issues that prevents Canadians from achieving their
potential. But there are few indications that any political party that is, or
has realistic dreams of becoming the ruling party will focus on solving those
problems. Instead we accept promises of someone doing something in the future
in exchange for promises to make our lives better in the short term.
While I hope I will always be uncomfortable in a world that
puts personal satisfaction and comfort ahead of assisting others, I would find it a bit more tolerable
if people would just be honest. If
people could stop pretending that they gave a damn about the children and their
families in sub-Saharan Africa or in parts of Central or South America or in
the mindless ( and mind boggling) chaos
of the Middle East; if we could just admit that ensuring that the services we
deemed to be necessary (like cheap cable and cell phone/internet rates) are the
appropriate priorities of the government; that what we really want are more
service for us and people like us (and that others pay higher taxes); if we
could just admit that we are basically just selfish - it is not that I would be
happy, but at least I would understand.
It is the hypocritical responses that drive me to toss and
turn each night, of having endless arguments with myself about what needs to be
said or done. It is our seemingly
endless capacity to lie to ourselves, to pretend that we are doing all that we
can while doing as little as possible that sometimes paralyses my thoughts.
Supporting elite athletes and eradicating hunger both within
Canada and the rest of the world may not be mutually exclusive goals. But they always will appear so unless we are
honest with ourselves and each other.