It is possible, if one stretched one's imagination to the
outmost limits, to conceive of the possibility that some people in the Canadian
Government might legitimately be concerned over an attack on Canadian soil by
foreign terrorists. It might even be a legitimate exercise to think about how
one would or could prevent such an attack. But that wild imagining is a long
way from assuming that ordinary Canadian citizens who feels as if they have
exhausted all normal means of getting the government's attention are terrorists
because they choose to protest over government action or inaction.
The role of CSIS
according to its own site is to:
report[s]
to, and advise[s], the Government of Canada to protect the country and its citizens. Key threats include terrorism, the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, espionage,
foreign interference and cyber-tampering affecting critical infrastructure.
CSIS programs are proactive and
pre-emptive.
The
CSIS Security Screening program, helps the Government of Canada prevent
non- Canadians who pose a threat to national
security from entering Canada or
acquiring status in this country, as well as preventing persons of national
security concern
from gaining access to
classified or sensitive government information, assets, sites or
major events.
(CSIS)
Yesterday the Toronto Star and every other major media
outlet in Canada reported that "CSIS helped government prepare for
Northern Gateway protests" (Toronto
Star). How does the above mandate even in the wildest imagination mentioned
above of some politician or bureaucrat allow CSIS to prepare reports on
Canadian citizens who are protesting in a reasonably civilized fashion? Were
there weapons of mass destruction available to the protesters? Were some
ideologically trained foreign espionage agents planning on destroying property?
What precious secrets would be divulged? The actions of the government and of
CSIS beg the question - can one be a good citizen and a terrorist at the same
time?
A few years back, I along with a relatively small number of
people chose to, for 30 or so minutes, block a major traffic intersection in
Peterborough. It was one of hundreds of Idle No More actions throughout the
country designed to draw attention to the myriad of First Nations issues that
successive Canadian Governments have refused to deal with. Was it illegal? Yes
- there was no parade permit and we did block traffic. Did the people who were
there know it was illegal? I did. Did we irritate drivers and interfere with
the commerce of the country? Yes, in a small way but yes. Should the Canadian
Government spend one nickel on investigating people who were there or infiltrating
the organization so that they could develop a plan to stop us? How absurd. If a
government refuses on one hand to address the issues raised by some of its
citizens and at the same time limits either through law or through threats of
intimidation the rights of those individuals to make their needs known, how
then should I respond?
I can think of only two ways. Either I bow down to the
government's wishes and become a non-participant in the process or I become
more active, perhaps more aggressive in my protest to get the government's
attention. The former suggestion is not, for me, a possibility. The latter, in
spite of the fact that I am a pacifist, is becoming more and more the only option. Breaking the law is becoming a more and more a legitimate option. In fact it might soon be the only one left.
No comments:
Post a Comment