A judge in Alberta has released her finding that Omar Khadr
should be allowed out of jail while waiting for his appeal both because he has
a strong basis for his appeal in the American courts and there is no reason to
believe that the Canadian public would be put at risk. There are still some
issues to be resolved in terms of bail conditions but one would have to believe
that Khadr and those who have been supporting his application for bail must be
ecstatic. Our Canadian government - not so much
In fact within moments of the announcement from the court,
Steven Blaney, Canada's Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
issued a statement expressing the government's disappointment with the judge's
decision and promising to appeal. They are appealing because he was convicted
of a "heinous crime" (CBC).
Once again the Harper Government is
going to waste my tax dollars appealing a case for which there are no valid
reasons to appeal. They are going to keep lock up (and thereby waste more of my
tax dollars) an individual who has already spent more than half of his young
life in jail. There are so many reasons why this is so wrong (see my blog from March
25,2015).
For the record Mr Blaney - the word heinous, according to
the Oxford Dictionary means "utterly odious or wicked" (Oxford
Dictionary). Even if Khadr did in fact throw the grenade that killed an
American soldier (which is what is being appealed in the American court), it
was done by a 15 year old boy, in the heat of battle, and under the influence
of his father and older brother. While the act (if done) was utterly wrong, it
was not heinous. In fact I would argue that the only reason why an individual
or a government would use such language is to perpetuate the myth that we all
need to be afraid of what someone is going to do to us and that the only people
who can protect us is the Harper Government.
Quite frankly Mr. Blaney, I would
feel a whole lot safer if you didn't protect me.
No comments:
Post a Comment