Last week one of the big Canadian news stories (as decided
by the major media outlets and their respective talking heads) was the decision
of the Canadian government to do away with legislation that allowed the
government to revoke the citizenship of Canadians convicted of terrorism and
other serious offences. Canadian
citizens that is, who hold dual citizenship.
The Liberal government has argued with some
validity that once a Canadian - always a Canadian. The government does not have
right to strip someone of their nationality - perhaps especially if that same
government has awarded that nationality. Taking away someone's right to be a
Canadian only means that the criminal will, after serving their sentence, get
deported to their country of origin. This process is problematic on a number of
levels. It just dumps the problem onto another country. It treats the
individual as someone unique rather than the criminal they are and it in the language of the government creates
two levels of citizenship. One for those who were born here and cannot have a
dual citizenship and one for those who were born elsewhere.
While I
agree with the government's direction, there is something that I do not
understand about the whole discussion. I don't understand dual citizenship. I
don't understand why someone who decided to leave their country of birth and
move to Canada would want to retain
their previous citizenship. It quite frankly feels as if that person wants the
best of both worlds. They want to have all of the advantages of being Canadian
- health care, educational opportunities and a vibrant, beautiful country relatively free
of strife etc. I also suspect that there is some security in carrying a
Canadian passport in terms belonging to a country that will, at least on paper
protect your rights, while traveling abroad. At the same time that holder of a
dual citizenship gets to use their other passport while traveling if it is
advantageous to them. I also suspect that it enables that person to reap whatever
economic or social advantages of still appearing to be a citizen of their
country of birth. That feels unfair. I don't think one can have it both ways.
Canada needs
immigrants. We need to continually improve our capacity to welcome to our
country people who want to live here. Canada has historically had a very high
percentage of people who come here, becoming Canadian citizens. But we need to
do more to ensure that those recent Canadians become full and active
participants in what John Ralston Saul has referred to as an "old
experiment, complex, and in worldly terms, largely successful " (one of my
favourite quotes as given by his wife the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson Governor General of Canada
- it goes on to say "Stumbling through darkness and racing through light,
we have persisted in the creation of a Canadian civilization) . However, in spite of my enthusiasm for Canada
to become a place where people want to live, I remain unconvinced that we need
to encourage people to come here by offering the right to dual citizenship.
It seems to
me that being a Canadian citizen should require everyone (not just new
immigrants) to make an unconditional commitment to the our country. Dual
citizenship does not suggest to me such a commitment but rather an attempt to
hedge one's bets.
The government
at the same time also suggested that rather than people waiting six years to
become a Canadian citizen (and only having to be in Canada for four of those
six years) that the waiting time be reduced to five years - but only actually
being in Canada for
three years. Again I don't understand. While of course people might need to
travel to visit family etc, why, if they want to make Canada the permanent home
,would they be out of the country for up to two years during the process of
becoming Canadian?
Perhaps it
is far too easy for all of us to be Canadians. Perhaps we all need to
demonstrate both some knowledge of our country, its history and laws as well as
the capacity to be engaged in our communities. Perhaps we should all stop
taking our citizenship for granted. Then perhaps we would be able to demand
more from those who want to live here.
No comments:
Post a Comment