Monday, April 25, 2016

When is Stealing not Stealing?



Canadians, at least according to the CBC are "are enraged by Netflix's declared war on cross-border watchers" (CBC).

For those of you who do not use or perhaps even care about Netflix - the issue is that those Americans who use Netflix have access to a far greater number of movies and television shows than do those of us who live in Canada. Some people in Canada think that that is unfair. Some of those people have found ways to work around the problem by purchasing a second service that "tricks" Netflix into believing that the watcher lives south of the border. In the past week or so, Netflix has started to shut down those secondary services and deny Canadians access to American programs.

It is my understanding that Netflix offers a different range of programs to different countries based on the royalty negotiations with the various producers of visual entertainment. In all likelihood - it is just too expensive for Netflix to pay for access to some programs or movies if the consumer base is too small. As much as I dislike capitalism - that sounds like a fairly reasonable reason for Netflix to not provide access to some programs.

According to the CBC - this crackdown on the part of Netflix to restrict access to only what people have paid for - has caused some upstanding citizens to gain access to this copyrighted material through illegal means. They are obtaining the material using bit torrent programs that allow viewers to download material posted illegally. Somehow those individuals seem to think it is their right that they should have access to material that they have not paid for. If people really wanted to watch these programs - they could. They would just have to pay for it.

When I was teaching - I use to ask my class if it was alright to shoplift a CD from Wal-Mart. Without exception - the general consensus was no. It was never clear to me if it was totally wrong because it was immoral or if because there was a risk of getting caught. When I would ask if it was okay to pirate music, movies or software - the answer was far less clear. But the general consensus over hundreds of students, was that it was okay to do so. When students were asked why it was okay to download a song without paying for it but not to take it from the store - the answer was almost always - "everyone does it". The argument that it was never okay to take something that doesn't belong to you did not resonate with the majority of my students.

If we lived in a rule-less society - I would understand people's decision to get what they wanted, when they wanted it at no cost. If the world that I (and they) lived in had no expectations of anyone being honest, then it would be normal to steal. If we all lived in a world where no one was judged for their actions, where no one faced public censor for stealing then to take without payment would be the norm.   But I (and they) don't live in any of those worlds. Just last week Mike Duffy was found not guilty of fraud etc. Thousands of Canadians were offended at the judge's ruling. People were upset that Duffy had taken money if not illegally, certainly without any thought to what was morally right.

I find it puzzling and disconcerting that people are so comfortable with this double standard. This standard says that other people should be judged by the highest standards of morality - but they, themselves are not;  that other people should pay for the services - but they do not have to; that they deserve full payment for their skills and services rendered, other people are not.

Instead of waiting for the rich capitalists, the corrupt politicians or those who are out and out criminals (although there are some who would argue that all three groups are the same) to change their ways - perhaps those of us who slightly bend the rules could become just a little bit more honest ourselves. If the rich and the powerful won't provide leadership - maybe we should.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Followers